Publisher logo
Sign Up
Saudi Journal of Radiology
Submit Manuscript
Back to Articles

Does adding a sequence in brain MRI help in evaluation of seizures?

Submission Type:

1 King Fahad Military Medical Complex Dhahran

2 Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia, Dhahran.

3 Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia, Dhahran.

4 Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia, Dhahran.

5 King Fahad Military Medical Complex

6 King Fahad Military Medical Complex

7 King Fahad Military Medical Complex

Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the diagnostic utility of ‘Susceptibility Weighted Angiogram’ (SWAN) in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by identifying venous angiomas causing epileptic seizures.

Method and Materials
A retrospective observational study was performed in the Radiology department at King Fahad Military Medical Complex (KFMC) hospital in Dhahran from January 2016 to 2021. All consecutive adult patients who underwent brain MRIs for epilepsy with SWAN were included. Patients with brain tumors, traumatic brain injuries, and post-surgical cases were excluded. The presence of tuft of small deep parenchymal veins draining into a more prominent (transcortical or subependymal) collector vein as seen on SWAN image was considered a venous angioma and confirmed on either contrast-enhanced studies or cerebral angiograms. Two experienced neuroradiologists interpreted the studies with mutual consensus. The significance of such finding was considered if SWAN-detected venous malformation corresponded to an epileptiform focus on respective electroencephalogram (EEG). Findings were compared with incidentally detected venous angiomas in normal brain MRIs in patients without indications of seizures (control group, n=112). Proportion analysis (Z-test) was used to determine significance.

Results
Out of 112 patients, 64 were females (57%), and 48 were males (43%), with a mean age of 19.24 (range, 5-45 years). Twenty-three patients (epilepsy group) were found to have venous malformations while three (control group) had venous angiomas (Z-value, 3.93; P-value, 0.0008). Out of 23 patients, 20.53% were SWAN-detected venous angiomas, 5 corresponded to epileptiform foci on respective EEGs compared to none of 3 incidentally detected venous angiomas in the control group (p-value, 0.0005).

Conclusion
Venous angiomas are usually asymptomatic when detected incidentally. However, adding a SWAN sequence in routine brain MRI for epilepsy patients may help to detect venous angiomas, which may cause focal seizure activity in these patients.

Main Subjects

Training
Radiological Education
Quality Assurance
+4

Keywords

Epilepsy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Susceptibility Weighted Angiogram
seizures
brain

License

Journal License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license

issue-coversheet

1, 1st Issue

Pages 1 - 8

Files

Download PDF

Article Insights

Article Views

49

PDF Downloads

5

References

  1. 1.
    Thijs RD, Surges R, O’Brien TJ, Sander JW. Epilepsy in adults. Lancet. 2019 Feb;393(10172):689–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32596-0 PMID:30686584
  2. 2.
    Perucca P, Scheffer IE, Kiley M. The management of epilepsy in children and adults. Med J Aust. 2018 Mar;208(5):226–33. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00951 PMID:29540143
  3. 3.
    Manford M. Recent advances in epilepsy. J Neurol. 2017 Aug;264(8):1811–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8394-2 PMID:28120042
  4. 4.
    Sidhu MK, Duncan JS, Sander JW. Neuroimaging in epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018 Aug;31(4):371–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000568 PMID:29782369
  5. 5.
    Bernasconi A, Cendes F, Theodore WH, Gill RS, Koepp MJ, Hogan RE, et al. Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy, Neuroimaging Task Force. Epilepsia. 2019 Jun;60(6):1054–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.15612 PMID:31135062
  6. 6.
    Mooney MA, Zabramski JM. Developmental venous anomalies. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017 Jan;143:279–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63640-9.00026-6 PMID:28552150
  7. 7.
    Barbosa Do Prado L, Han C, Oh SP, Su H. Recent Advances in Basic Research for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct;20(21):5324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215324 PMID:31731545
  8. 8.
    Liu S, Buch S, Chen Y, Choi HS, Dai Y, Habib C, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions. NMR Biomed. 2017 Apr;30(4):e3552. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3552
  9. 9.
    De Ciantis A, Barba C, Tassi L, Cosottini M, Tosetti M, Costagli M, et al. 7T MRI in focal epilepsy with unrevealing conventional field strength imaging. Epilepsia. 2016 Mar;57(3):445–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13313 PMID:26778405
  10. 10.
    Zafar A, Quadri SA, Farooqui M, Ikram A, Robinson M, Hart BL, et al. Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1294–301. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022314 PMID:30909834
  11. 11.
    Awad IA, Polster SP. Cavernous angiomas: deconstructing a neurosurgical disease. J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;131(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.3.JNS181724 PMID:31261134
  12. 12.
    George U, Jolappara M, Kesavadas C, Gupta AK. Susceptibility-weighted imaging in the evaluation of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurol India. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):608–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.68668 PMID:20739804
  13. 13.
    Fujiwara T, Watanabe Y, Tanaka H, Takahashi H, Matsuo C, Fujiwara M, et al. Silent susceptibility-weighted angiography to detect hemorrhagic lesions in the brain: a clinical and phantom study. Neuroradiology. 2020 Feb;62(2):205–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02296-9 PMID:31696239
  14. 14.
    Kirsch W, McAuley G, Holshouser B, Petersen F, Ayaz M, Vinters HV, et al. Serial susceptibility weighted MRI measures brain iron and microbleeds in dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17(3):599–609. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2009-1073 PMID:19433895
  15. 15.
    Eldeş T, Beyazal Çeliker F, Bilir Ö, Ersunan G, Yavaşi Ö, Turan A, et al. How important is susceptibility-weighted imaging in mild traumatic brain injury? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jul;26(4):574-579. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.35485.
  16. 16.
    Schwarz D, Bendszus M, Breckwoldt MO. Clinical Value of Susceptibility Weighted Imaging of Brain Metastases. Front Neurol. 2020 Feb;11:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00055 PMID:32117017
  17. 17.
    Gaitán MI, Yañez P, Paday Formenti ME, Calandri I, Figueiredo E, Sati P, et al. SWAN-Venule: An Optimized MRI Technique to Detect the Central Vein Sign in MS Plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):456–60. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6437 PMID:32054616
  18. 18.
    Haacke EM, Ye Y. The role of susceptibility weighted imaging in functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug;62(2):923–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.020 PMID:22245649
  19. 19.
    De Ciantis A, Barkovich AJ, Cosottini M, Barba C, Montanaro D, Costagli M, et al. Ultra-high-field MR imaging in polymicrogyria and epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Feb;36(2):309–16. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4116 PMID:25258368
  20. 20.
    Yamaguchi S, Horie N, Morikawa M, Tateishi Y, Hiu T, Morofuji Y, et al. Assessment of veins in T2*-weighted MR angiography predicts infarct growth in hyperacute ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2018 Apr;13(4):e0195554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195554 PMID:29617449